search_cases
Finds Federal Court decisions by words in the judgment, its citation, the judge, the National Practice Area, catchwords or the Commonwealth legislation it cites. Each result is a decision with a short snippet, never a passage to quote.
A judgment is not legislation. Where a response names a Commonwealth title, the title carries a status block saying whether the Federal Register records it as in force today; a title not in force has no Advisor link, only its Federal Register link.
Note: case law has its own scope, terms and limits, and your service must keep them.
- Federal Court only. Advisor holds decisions of the Federal Court of Australia, cited
FCAandFCAFC. It holds no other court's judgments, and no state or territory law.- What is held, and the gap. Decisions to 4 March 2025, from the Open Australian Legal Corpus, and decisions from 23 October 2026, from the Court's own published pages. Decisions between those dates are not held yet. A citation to one resolves to
unresolved_in_corpus: the judgment is not held, which says nothing about whether it exists.- Reproduced unaltered, and attributed. Each answer carries
attribution: "© Federal Court of Australia (Commonwealth of Australia). Reproduced unaltered under the Federal Court of Australia copyright licence." Keep it with any passage you show, and do not edit a quotation.- Not the official report. Each decision carries
source_url, the Court's page. Where an authorised report exists, it governs.- How a passage was checked.
anchor.labelsays how many independent sources a judgment's text comes from. Most decisions say "single source (OALC bootstrap; awaiting FCA Court HTML dual-source check)": no second source has been compared yet.- What a paragraph number rests on.
paragraph_structureandparagraph_structure_notesay it: the Court's own page (court_html), the judgment's own certificate of how many numbered paragraphs it has (certified), numbering found with no certificate to check it (numbering), a numbered list such as orders that is not paragraph numbering (unnumbered: the judgment is held as one block,0), or no numbering at all (unsplit,disputed). Where Advisor cannot confirm that a judgment's last numbered paragraph is one paragraph,paragraph_not_confirmedsays so.
| Fact | Value |
|---|---|
| Tool | search_cases |
| Partner scope required | caselaw:read |
| Subscriber tier required | AI Pro |
Accepts as_at | no |
Parameters
| Name | Type | Required | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
query | string | yes | |
court | string | no | null |
date_from | string | no | null |
date_to | string | no | null |
judge | string | no | null |
npa | string | no | null |
legislation_cited | string | no | null |
catchwords | string | no | null |
limit | integer | no | 10 |
offset | integer | no | 0 |
cursor | string | no | null |
Request (search_cases with {"query":"derivative action","court":"FCA","limit":2})
Python SDK
import asyncio, os
from mcp import ClientSession
from mcp.client.streamable_http import streamablehttp_client
async def main():
headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['LAWATLAS_API_KEY']}"}
async with streamablehttp_client("https://advisor.lawatlas.ai/api/mcp", headers=headers) as (read, write, _):
async with ClientSession(read, write) as session:
await session.initialize()
result = await session.call_tool("search_cases", {
"query": "derivative action",
"court": "FCA",
"limit": 2
})
print(result.content[0].text)
asyncio.run(main())
curl
curl -s https://advisor.lawatlas.ai/api/mcp \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $LAWATLAS_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Accept: application/json, text/event-stream" \
-d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"search_cases","arguments":{"query":"derivative action","court":"FCA","limit":2}}}'
Response, as Advisor returned it on 8 November 2026. The tool's result is the JSON text of result.content[0].text; lists and long text are trimmed where marked "...".
{
"schema_version": "3.10",
"result": [
{
"case_id": "9daa1972-4998-446c-b096-dcad5b4a7025",
"court": "FCA",
"year": 2010,
"number": 570,
"neutral_citation": "[2010] FCA 570",
"citation_aglc": "*Wood v Links Golf Tasmania Pty Ltd* [2010] FCA 570",
"case_name": "Wood v Links Golf Tasmania Pty Ltd",
"judges": [
"Finkelstein J"
],
"bench_size": 1,
"is_full_court": false,
"full_court_basis": null,
"decision_date": "2010-06-08",
"registry": null,
"division": "GENERAL DIVISION",
"npa": null,
"sub_npa": null,
"catchwords": "CORPORATIONS – derivate action – whether company to pay the costs – principles to be applied",
"catchword_phrases": [
"CORPORATIONS",
"derivate action",
"whether company to pay the costs",
"... 1 more"
],
"parallel_citations": [],
"paragraph_count": 12,
"word_count": 2004,
"text_quality": "oalc",
"verification_state": "single_source_oalc",
"anchor": {
"state": "single_source_oalc",
"text_quality": "oalc",
"metadata_source": "oalc",
"source_html_sha256": null,
"verification_note": null,
"label": "single source (OALC bootstrap; awaiting FCA Court HTML dual-source check)"
},
"source_url": "https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2010/2010fca0570",
"advisor_url": "/c/FCA/2010/570",
"match_kind": "full_text",
"score": 0.0514,
"matched_paragraphs": [
{
"para_num": 4,
"para_id": "para-4",
"heading_path": [],
"content_hash": "1eb451174ea6db0fb78c74827780d632af2f506bb12028174fd5820614f0b4e2",
"snippet_html": "clear that leave to bring a so-called <mark>derivative</mark> <mark>action</mark> requires a substantial showing: Swansson v R A Pratt Properties Pty Ltd (2002) 42 ACSR 313, 318. This follows from the evident",
"snippet_text": "clear that leave to bring a so-called derivative action requires a substantial showing: Swansson v R A Pratt Properties Pty Ltd (2002) 42 ACSR 313, 318. This follows from the evident"
},
{
"para_num": 0,
"para_id": "para-0",
"heading_path": [],
"content_hash": "2aac253b9e3f328d1b44732a93658713786fff11c75e8d8fc2d53a534ee34b40",
"snippet_html": "Judge: FINKELSTEIN J\n\nDate of judgment: 8 June 2010\n\nCatchwords: CORPORATIONS – <mark>derivate</mark> <mark>action</mark> – whether company to pay the costs – principles to be applied\n\nLegislation: Corporations",
"snippet_text": "Judge: FINKELSTEIN J\n\nDate of judgment: 8 June 2010\n\nCatchwords: CORPORATIONS – derivate action – whether company to pay the costs – principles to be applied\n\nLegislation: Corporations"
}
],
"legislation_cited": [
{
"canonical_aglc": "*Corporations Act 2001* (Cth)",
"title": "Corporations Act 2001",
"short_title": "Corporations Act",
"pinpoint": null,
"legislation_id": "8d10b297-598e-4127-88ae-d7411655afe1",
"frl_title_id": "C2004A00818",
"component": null,
"eid": null,
"provision_id": null,
"resolution_status": "resolved",
"advisor_url": "/l/C2004A00818/compilation_149/main/root",
"status": {
"in_force": true,
"frl_status": "InForce",
"since": null,
"confirmed_with_frl_at": "2026-11-02T17:26:23.541914Z",
"frl_link": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2026C00432",
"notice": "In force according to the Federal Register of Legislation, as last confirmed on the date shown.",
"compilation": {
"register_id": "C2026C00432",
"compilation_no": 149,
"check_date": "2026-11-07T17:25:09.705759Z",
"state": "current",
"notice": "The Federal Register listed this compilation as the current one on the check date."
}
}
}
],
"cases_cited_count": 9
},
{
"case_id": "103c1f36-5169-4d65-9e20-d3b3f409d99f",
"court": "FCA",
"year": 2013,
"number": 143,
"neutral_citation": "[2013] FCA 143",
"citation_aglc": "*Wood v Links Golf Tasmania Pty Ltd (No 2)* [2013] FCA 143",
"case_name": "Wood v Links Golf Tasmania Pty Ltd (No 2)",
"judges": [
"Gordon J"
],
"bench_size": 1,
"is_full_court": false,
"full_court_basis": null,
"decision_date": "2013-02-27",
"registry": null,
"division": "GENERAL DIVISION",
"npa": null,
"sub_npa": null,
"catchwords": "CORPORATIONS – derivate action – proposed derivative action an appeal – requirements in s 437(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where applicant to provide an undertaking to meet the costs of the company and any adverse costs orders – means of the applicant to meet the undertaking – Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 437",
"catchword_phrases": [
"CORPORATIONS",
"derivate action",
"proposed derivative action an appeal",
"... 4 more"
],
"parallel_citations": [],
"paragraph_count": 59,
"word_count": 8552,
"text_quality": "oalc",
"verification_state": "single_source_oalc",
"anchor": {
"state": "single_source_oalc",
"text_quality": "oalc",
"metadata_source": "oalc",
"source_html_sha256": null,
"verification_note": null,
"label": "single source (OALC bootstrap; awaiting FCA Court HTML dual-source check)"
},
"source_url": "https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2013/2013fca0143",
"advisor_url": "/c/FCA/2013/143",
"match_kind": "full_text",
"score": 0.045,
"matched_paragraphs": [
{
"para_num": 57,
"para_id": "para-57",
"heading_path": [],
"content_hash": "ff1ad6d07551a7c5a019db330794213d729b911e3225b5b6ac55d3f86a451ffe",
"snippet_html": "Links referred to Swansson at [39] as authority for the proposition that where a <mark>derivative</mark> <mark>action</mark> is to be brought by a former shareholder or officer, the Court will scrutinise with particular … scrutiny \"where the applicant … [has] nothing obvious to gain directly by the success of the <mark>derivative</mark> <mark>action</mark>\": Swansson at [39]. Further, in Swansson, Palmer J went on to give two examples which",
"snippet_text": "Links referred to Swansson at [39] as authority for the proposition that where a derivative action is to be brought by a former shareholder or officer, the Court will scrutinise with particular … scrutiny \"where the applicant … [has] nothing obvious to gain directly by the success of the derivative action\": Swansson at [39]. Further, in Swansson, Palmer J went on to give two examples which"
},
{
"para_num": 55,
"para_id": "para-55",
"heading_path": [],
"content_hash": "6c87fb0494be15a8f3100646960a95dd351f42c7c21cb90094198c5a3b59b4a6",
"snippet_html": "demonstrate good faith where the application is made by a current shareholder and the <mark>derivative</mark> <mark>action</mark> seeks recovery of property so that the value of the applicant's shares would be increased … consider the applicant's offer to indemnify the company for its costs of the <mark>derivative</mark> <mark>action</mark>: South Johnstone Mill",
"snippet_text": "demonstrate good faith where the application is made by a current shareholder and the derivative action seeks recovery of property so that the value of the applicant's shares would be increased … consider the applicant's offer to indemnify the company for its costs of the derivative action: South Johnstone Mill"
}
],
"legislation_cited": [
{
"canonical_aglc": "*Corporations Act 2001* (Cth)",
"title": "Corporations Act 2001",
"short_title": "Corporations Act",
"pinpoint": null,
"legislation_id": "8d10b297-598e-4127-88ae-d7411655afe1",
"frl_title_id": "C2004A00818",
"component": null,
"eid": null,
"provision_id": null,
"resolution_status": "resolved",
"advisor_url": "/l/C2004A00818/compilation_149/main/root",
"status": {
"in_force": true,
"frl_status": "InForce",
"since": null,
"confirmed_with_frl_at": "2026-11-02T17:26:23.541914Z",
"frl_link": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2026C00432",
"notice": "In force according to the Federal Register of Legislation, as last confirmed on the date shown.",
"compilation": {
"register_id": "C2026C00432",
"compilation_no": 149,
"check_date": "2026-11-07T17:25:09.705759Z",
"state": "current",
"notice": "The Federal Register listed this compilation as the current one on the check date."
}
}
},
{
"canonical_aglc": "*Corporations Act 2001* (Cth) s 237",
"title": "Corporations Act 2001",
"short_title": "Corporations Act",
"pinpoint": "s 237",
"legislation_id": "8d10b297-598e-4127-88ae-d7411655afe1",
"frl_title_id": "C2004A00818",
"component": "main",
"eid": "sec_237",
"provision_id": "5c0b4c19-6d86-47cc-9f5a-bb62ef910f77",
"resolution_status": "resolved",
"advisor_url": "/l/C2004A00818/compilation_149/main/sec_237",
"status": {
"in_force": true,
"frl_status": "InForce",
"since": null,
"confirmed_with_frl_at": "2026-11-02T17:26:23.541914Z",
"frl_link": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2026C00432",
"notice": "In force according to the Federal Register of Legislation, as last confirmed on the date shown.",
"compilation": {
"register_id": "C2026C00432",
"compilation_no": 149,
"check_date": "2026-11-07T17:25:09.705759Z",
"state": "current",
"notice": "The Federal Register listed this compilation as the current one on the check date."
}
}
},
{
"canonical_aglc": "*Corporations Act 2001* (Cth) s 437(2)",
"title": "Corporations Act 2001",
"short_title": "Corporations Act",
"pinpoint": "s 437(2)",
"legislation_id": "8d10b297-598e-4127-88ae-d7411655afe1",
"frl_title_id": "C2004A00818",
"component": "main",
"eid": "sec_437",
"provision_id": null,
"resolution_status": "not_in_current",
"advisor_url": "/l/C2004A00818/compilation_149/main/sec_437",
"status": {
"in_force": true,
"frl_status": "InForce",
"since": null,
"confirmed_with_frl_at": "2026-11-02T17:26:23.541914Z",
"frl_link": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2026C00432",
"notice": "In force according to the Federal Register of Legislation, as last confirmed on the date shown.",
"compilation": {
"register_id": "C2026C00432",
"compilation_no": 149,
"check_date": "2026-11-07T17:25:09.705759Z",
"state": "current",
"notice": "The Federal Register listed this compilation as the current one on the check date."
}
}
}
],
"cases_cited_count": 18
}
],
"page": {
"returned": 2,
"total": 2572,
"next_cursor": "eyJvIjogMn0=",
"truncated": false,
"limit_requested": 2,
"limit_applied": 2
},
"query": "derivative action",
"attribution": "© Federal Court of Australia (Commonwealth of Australia). Reproduced unaltered under the Federal Court of Australia copyright licence.",
"usage": "Search snippets only. Call get_judgment_paragraphs before quoting any passage from a judgment, and cite the AGLC4 citation, advisor_url (/c/...), and authoritative source_url."
}
Notes
- A snippet is a locator. Fetch the paragraph with
get_judgment_paragraphsbefore quoting anything. - Filters:
court(FCAorFCAFC),date_fromanddate_to(YYYY-MM-DD),judge(a surname),npa,catchwordsandlegislation_cited. A judge or practice-area filter can only find a decision whose cover sheet names them: the judge is held for about 86% of decisions, catchwords for about 41% and the practice area for about 29%. - Paging.
limitis capped at 46. Passpage.next_cursorback ascursor, or useoffset. - Full Court.
is_full_courtsays whether the decision is a Full Court's, andfull_court_basiswhat that rests on: the citation (FCAFC), or, before 2002, when a Full Court was citedFCA, three or more judges named on its cover sheet.